Peer Review Policy
The publisher uses editorial and review procedures appropriate to the stated conference publication workflow.
Status: Initial publication draft
Review model
The specific review model used for a conference should be stated in the conference's call for papers or author instructions. This platform does not automatically claim single-blind, double-blind, or open peer review unless that process has been configured and actually used by the conference organizers.
Reviewer responsibilities
- Provide an objective assessment based on the scope and criteria supplied by the conference.
- Treat manuscripts and unpublished information as confidential.
- Identify relevant concerns about methodology, attribution, originality, or unsupported claims.
- Decline the assignment when a conflict of interest could impair impartial assessment.
Editorial decisions
Publication decisions remain the responsibility of the designated conference editorial team. Review recommendations inform decisions but do not, by themselves, constitute a publication guarantee.
Confidentiality
Submitted material should not be shared beyond those who need access for editorial, review, production, or integrity purposes.